MUNI “Exploring” New and Improved Ways to Pay for Service – But Seems to Forget Some Basics

If you’ve read the N Judah Chronicles for any length of time, you know that one thing I have consistently advocated for is a more stable source of funding for the service so it just works, instead of having it go down the “no money, cut budget, no money, cut more” toilet bowl.
In both today’s Chronicle, and today’s Examiner, some new ideas were proposed for discussion, ranging from the usual (increase parking ticket costs, and meters) to the dumb (automatic fare increases, charging for “transfers”) to the wild-eyed (selling sodas at rail stations and jacking up random taxes for fun).
Realize, that this comes on the heels of Mayor Newsom’s fanciful proposal to eliminate all fares, which gets the excitable folk in town all happy and smiley at the concept. Of course there’s no way to pay for it, aside junkie logic about how “collecting the money costs too much.” But hey! It made people feel good, right?
And to add to the cavalcade of “good feelings” we had the proposal to cut bus passes for the oppressed 18 to
24 21 year olds, because we “should” – and the “money” will just “appear,” right?

Whatever. Lost in all of these discussions are some basic economics we were treated to just a few weeks ago about the fact that MUNI and the MTA don’t collect even close to the amount of money they’re already owed. The losses estimated from junkie fare evaders at just 3 stations was estimated to be almost 33 million dollars. That’s a big chunk of that deficit – at only three stations.
No transit system in the world raises all its cash from the farebox, but if MUNI just collected a little bit more from the cheats, and the DPT collected just a little bit more of what it’s already owed, there’d be no need for higher taxes, or things like jacking fares automatically, et al.
It’s good that MUNI and the MTA are exploring other options for funding, and it would be nice if they’d do more to solicit ideas from the public-at-large. However, as we go down this road, it’s important to not lose sight of what is practical, and do-able, and get lost in ideas that end up causing more trouble than they’re worth.

This entry was posted in Local History, MUNI/SFMTA, News & Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to MUNI “Exploring” New and Improved Ways to Pay for Service – But Seems to Forget Some Basics

  1. …I swear, if MUNI could manage to collect fares from the cheaters on the 30 and 45 lines, they’d have more money than they would know what do with. (Ever see the cheaters at the Market stops?) Oy.

  2. Mac says:

    Setting Cops or even MUNI cops on all the stops at Mission/Market would do it. Seriously, just getting the cheaters at 3rd & Market and 4th & Market will reap in massive cash.
    …selling sodas at rail stations. Just what we need: STICKIER floors! ;-p

  3. MattyMatt says:

    Didn’t SPUR release a report over a year ago with solutions spelled out in exacting detail? Oh, why, yes, yes they did.

  4. meinWestAdd says:

    Unfortunately, MUNI will never be able to raise the $150 million they need just from fare cheats… not even close. So get ready to pick your poison. The money has to come from somewhere. If you are hoping not to feel the pain personally, you could push for the downtown business assessment. Though you *might* feel that indirectly.
    I just hope they aren’t serious about putting TV ads in the buses. Talk about hell on wheels.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.